Core 2 Duo T7300 vs Core 2 Extreme X7900

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme X7900 and Core 2 Duo T7300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2675not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 ExtremeIntel Core 2 Duo
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date1 September 2007 (17 years ago)9 May 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$851$234

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme X7900 and Core 2 Duo T7300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache128 KB64 KB
L2 cache4 MB4 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die size143 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.1V-1.375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme X7900 and Core 2 Duo T7300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPPGA478PBGA479,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme X7900 and Core 2 Duo T7300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States-+
Demand Based Switching--
AMT+no data
FSB parity--
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme X7900 and Core 2 Duo T7300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme X7900 and Core 2 Duo T7300 are enumerated here.

VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme X7900 and Core 2 Duo T7300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Extreme X7900 1104
+62.4%
Core 2 Duo T7300 680

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Extreme X7900 387
+79.2%
Core 2 Duo T7300 216

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Extreme X7900 625
+79.1%
Core 2 Duo T7300 349

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Extreme X7900 3022
+48.1%
Core 2 Duo T7300 2040

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Extreme X7900 5764
+54.4%
Core 2 Duo T7300 3733

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Extreme X7900 2449
+41.6%
Core 2 Duo T7300 1729

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2007 9 May 2007
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 35 Watt

Core 2 Extreme X7900 has an age advantage of 3 months.

Core 2 Duo T7300, on the other hand, has 25.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme X7900 and Core 2 Duo T7300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme X7900 and Core 2 Duo T7300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme X7900
Core 2 Extreme X7900
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300
Core 2 Duo T7300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 6 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme X7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 115 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme X7900 or Core 2 Duo T7300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.