Turion 64 ML-40 vs Core 2 Extreme X7800
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Extreme X7800 and Turion 64 ML-40 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2691 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Extreme | Turion 64 |
| Power efficiency | 1.55 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Merom XE (2007) | Lancaster (2005−2006) |
| Release date | 17 July 2007 (17 years ago) | June 2005 (19 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $851 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Extreme X7800 and Turion 64 ML-40 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB L2 Cache | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 125 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | 114 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.1V-1.375V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Extreme X7800 and Turion 64 ML-40 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | 754 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 44 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme X7800 and Turion 64 ML-40. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| PowerNow | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Extreme X7800 and Turion 64 ML-40 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme X7800 and Turion 64 ML-40 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 44 Watt | 35 Watt |
Core 2 Extreme X7800 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.
Turion 64 ML-40, on the other hand, has 25.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme X7800 and Turion 64 ML-40. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme X7800 and Turion 64 ML-40, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
