A4-9120C vs Core 2 Extreme X7800
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Extreme X7800 outperforms A4-9120C by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Extreme X7800 and A4-9120C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2689 | 2840 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Extreme | AMD Bristol Ridge |
| Power efficiency | 1.54 | 8.51 |
| Architecture codename | Merom XE (2007) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 17 July 2007 (17 years ago) | 6 January 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $851 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Extreme X7800 and A4-9120C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 16 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB L2 Cache | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 124.5 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | 1200 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.1V-1.375V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Extreme X7800 and A4-9120C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PPGA478 | BGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 44 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme X7800 and A4-9120C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Virtualization, |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Extreme X7800 and A4-9120C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme X7800 and A4-9120C are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme X7800 and A4-9120C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 14.936 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.73 | 0.55 |
| Recency | 17 July 2007 | 6 January 2019 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 44 Watt | 6 Watt |
Core 2 Extreme X7800 has a 32.7% higher aggregate performance score.
A4-9120C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 633.3% lower power consumption.
The Core 2 Extreme X7800 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-9120C in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme X7800 and A4-9120C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
