3015e vs Core 2 Extreme X7800

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Extreme X7800
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 44 Watt
0.72
3015e
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.69
+135%

3015e outperforms Core 2 Extreme X7800 by a whopping 135% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme X7800 and 3015e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27072065
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 ExtremeAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency1.5526.64
Architecture codenameMerom XE (2007)Pollock (Zen) (2020)
Release date17 July 2007 (17 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$851no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme X7800 and 3015e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB192 KB
L2 cache4 MB1 MB
L3 cache4 MB L2 Cache4 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.1V-1.375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme X7800 and 3015e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478FT5
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme X7800 and 3015e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme X7800 and 3015e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme X7800 and 3015e are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme X7800 and 3015e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Extreme X7800 0.72
3015e 1.69
+135%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Extreme X7800 1138
3015e 2677
+135%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.72 1.69
Recency 17 July 2007 4 August 2020
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 6 Watt

3015e has a 134.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 100% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 633.3% lower power consumption.

The 3015e is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Extreme X7800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme X7800 and 3015e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme X7800
Core 2 Extreme X7800
AMD 3015e
3015e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 2 Extreme X7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 30 votes

Rate 3015e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme X7800 or 3015e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.