Core Ultra 9 285T vs Core 2 Extreme QX9775

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Core Ultra 9 285T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release dateMarch 2008 (16 years ago)January 2025

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Core Ultra 9 285T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed3.2 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz5.4 GHz
Bus rate1600 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB (shared)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm3 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2243 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)63 °Cno data
Number of transistors820 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Core Ultra 9 285T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA7711851
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Core Ultra 9 285T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Core Ultra 9 285T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Core Ultra 9 285T are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Core Ultra 9 285T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR5 Depends on motherboard

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Core Ultra 9 285T.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 45 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 35 Watt

Ultra 9 285T has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 1400% more advanced lithography process, and 328.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Core Ultra 9 285T. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Core Ultra 9 285T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775
Core 2 Extreme QX9775
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T
Core Ultra 9 285T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 44 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX9775 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 3 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX9775 or Core Ultra 9 285T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.