Celeron G440 vs Core 2 Extreme QX9775
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Celeron G440 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Architecture codename | Yorkfield (2007−2009) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
Release date | March 2008 (16 years ago) | 4 September 2011 (13 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $45 |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Celeron G440 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
Bus rate | 1600 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64 KB |
L2 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 256 KB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 1 MB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | 2x 107 mm2 | 131 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 66 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 63 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 820 million | 504 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.35V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Celeron G440 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | LGA771 | FCLGA1155 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Celeron G440. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | - |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
Idle States | + | + |
Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
FDI | no data | + |
Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Celeron G440 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | - |
EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Celeron G440 are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | - |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Celeron G440. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 17 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 1 GHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Celeron G440 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Celeron G440.
PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 35 Watt |
Core 2 Extreme QX9775 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Celeron G440, on the other hand, has a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 328.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Celeron G440. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Celeron G440, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.