A9-9420 vs Core 2 Extreme QX9650

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and A9-9420 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2503
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiencyno data5.96
Architecture codenameYorkfield (2007−2009)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release dateNovember 2007 (17 years ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and A9-9420 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)160 KB
L2 cache12 MB (shared)1 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2125 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)64 °C74 °C
Number of transistors820 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and A9-9420 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FT4
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and A9-9420. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and A9-9420 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and A9-9420 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and A9-9420. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataRadeon R5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and A9-9420.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 15 Watt

Core 2 Extreme QX9650 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

A9-9420, on the other hand, has a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 766.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and A9-9420. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Extreme QX9650 is a desktop processor while A9-9420 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX9650 and A9-9420, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
Core 2 Extreme QX9650
AMD A9-9420
A9-9420

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 115 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX9650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 510 votes

Rate A9-9420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX9650 or A9-9420, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.