VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 vs Core 2 Extreme QX6850
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6850 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2190 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) | C3-M |
| Power efficiency | 1.05 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Kentsfield (2007) | Nehemiah |
| Release date | no data | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6850 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1333 MHz | 200 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 8 MB (shared) | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 2x 143 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 64 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 582 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6850 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 775 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 18 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6850 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6850 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 18 Watt |
Core 2 Extreme QX6850 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
VIA C3-M C3-M-1200, on the other hand, has 622.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme QX6850 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1200. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core 2 Extreme QX6850 is a desktop processor while VIA C3-M C3-M-1200 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX6850 and VIA C3-M C3-M-1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
