Core 2 Solo SU3500 vs Core 2 Extreme QX6700
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Extreme QX6700 outperforms Core 2 Solo SU3500 by a whopping 682% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and Core 2 Solo SU3500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2248 | 3269 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) | Intel Core 2 Solo |
| Power efficiency | 0.97 | 2.93 |
| Architecture codename | Kentsfield (2007) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 1 April 2009 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $262 |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and Core 2 Solo SU3500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.67 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1066 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 3 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 3 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.05V-1.15V |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and Core 2 Solo SU3500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | BGA956 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 5.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and Core 2 Solo SU3500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and Core 2 Solo SU3500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and Core 2 Solo SU3500 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.33 | 0.17 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 5 Watt |
Core 2 Extreme QX6700 has a 682.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Core 2 Solo SU3500, on the other hand, has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 2500% lower power consumption.
The Core 2 Extreme QX6700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Solo SU3500 in performance tests.
Note that Core 2 Extreme QX6700 is a desktop processor while Core 2 Solo SU3500 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and Core 2 Solo SU3500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
