Core Ultra 9 288V vs Core 2 Duo U7500

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo U7500 and Core Ultra 9 288V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated618
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duono data
Power efficiencyno data38.80
Architecture codenameMerom-2048 (2006−2008)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date27 July 2006 (18 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo U7500 and Core Ultra 9 288V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed1.06 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.06 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz37 MHz
L1 cache64 KB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm3 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.8V-0.975Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo U7500 and Core Ultra 9 288V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPBGA479Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo U7500 and Core Ultra 9 288V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
TSX-+

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo U7500 and Core Ultra 9 288V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo U7500 and Core Ultra 9 288V are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo U7500 and Core Ultra 9 288V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo U7500 and Core Ultra 9 288V.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo U7500 392
Ultra 9 288V 19542
+4885%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo U7500 1116
Ultra 9 288V 10697
+859%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo U7500 1976
Ultra 9 288V 45377
+2196%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo U7500 875
Ultra 9 288V 12505
+1329%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 July 2006 24 September 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 65 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 30 Watt

Core 2 Duo U7500 has 200% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 288V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 18 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo U7500 and Core Ultra 9 288V. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo U7500 and Core Ultra 9 288V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo U7500
Core 2 Duo U7500
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Core Ultra 9 288V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 21 vote

Rate Core 2 Duo U7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 10 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 288V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo U7500 or Core Ultra 9 288V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.