Turion 64 X2 TL-60 vs Core 2 Duo T9900

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T9900 and Turion 64 X2 TL-60 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2651not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duo2x AMD Turion 64
Power efficiency2.02no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Trinidad/Tyler (2007)
Release date2 June 2009 (15 years ago)4 May 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$530no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T9900 and Turion 64 X2 TL-60 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.06 GHzno data
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache6 MB (shared)1 MB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size107 mm2147 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C95 °C
Number of transistors410 million154 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.05V-1.2125Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T9900 and Turion 64 X2 TL-60 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketBGA479,PGA478S1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35/31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T9900 and Turion 64 X2 TL-60. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data90/65 nm, 1.075
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T9900 and Turion 64 X2 TL-60 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T9900 and Turion 64 X2 TL-60 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T9900 and Turion 64 X2 TL-60. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo T9900 398
+116%
Turion 64 X2 TL-60 184

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo T9900 638
+84.4%
Turion 64 X2 TL-60 346

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo T9900 3538
+118%
Turion 64 X2 TL-60 1619

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo T9900 7094
+127%
Turion 64 X2 TL-60 3130

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo T9900 2787
+91.3%
Turion 64 X2 TL-60 1457

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Core 2 Duo T9900 25.1
+55.4%
Turion 64 X2 TL-60 39

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 June 2009 4 May 2007
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm

Core 2 Duo T9900 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo T9900 and Turion 64 X2 TL-60. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T9900 and Turion 64 X2 TL-60, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T9900
Core 2 Duo T9900
AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60
Turion 64 X2 TL-60

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 135 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T9900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 105 votes

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T9900 or Turion 64 X2 TL-60, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.