Core 2 Duo T5750 vs Core 2 Duo T8100

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T8100
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.48
+9.1%
Core 2 Duo T5750
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.44

Core 2 Duo T8100 outperforms Core 2 Duo T5750 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T8100 and Core 2 Duo T5750 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29072953
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency1.291.22
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date10 January 2008 (16 years ago)1 May 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$209no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T8100 and Core 2 Duo T5750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz667 MHz
L2 cache3 MB2 MB
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cache2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size107 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C85 °C
Number of transistors410 Million291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.25V1.075V-1.175V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T8100 and Core 2 Duo T5750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA479,PGA478PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T8100 and Core 2 Duo T5750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T8100 and Core 2 Duo T5750 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T8100 and Core 2 Duo T5750 are enumerated here.

VT-x+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T8100 0.48
+9.1%
Core 2 Duo T5750 0.44

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T8100 770
+9.7%
Core 2 Duo T5750 702

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo T8100 271
+36.2%
Core 2 Duo T5750 199

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo T8100 429
+29.6%
Core 2 Duo T5750 331

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo T8100 1878
+8.1%
Core 2 Duo T5750 1738

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Core 2 Duo T8100 37.5
+10.1%
Core 2 Duo T5750 41.3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.48 0.44
Recency 10 January 2008 1 May 2008
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm

Core 2 Duo T8100 has a 9.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Duo T5750, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Duo T8100 and Core 2 Duo T5750.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T8100 and Core 2 Duo T5750, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T8100
Core 2 Duo T8100
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750
Core 2 Duo T5750

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 89 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 88 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T5750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T8100 or Core 2 Duo T5750, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.