Celeron T1600 vs Core 2 Duo T8100

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T8100
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.48
+37.1%

Core 2 Duo T8100 outperforms Celeron T1600 by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T8100 and Celeron T1600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29073067
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duono data
Power efficiency1.290.94
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)no data
Release date10 January 2008 (16 years ago)1 October 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$209no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T8100 and Celeron T1600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads2no data
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHzno data
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L2 cache3 MBno data
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cache1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.25V1.075V-1.175V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T8100 and Celeron T1600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA479,PGA478PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T8100 and Celeron T1600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+-
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T8100 and Celeron T1600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T8100 and Celeron T1600 are enumerated here.

VT-x+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T8100 0.48
+37.1%
Celeron T1600 0.35

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T8100 770
+39.7%
Celeron T1600 551

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo T8100 271
+41.1%
Celeron T1600 192

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo T8100 429
+21.5%
Celeron T1600 353

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.48 0.35
Recency 10 January 2008 1 October 2008
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm

Core 2 Duo T8100 has a 37.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron T1600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months.

The Core 2 Duo T8100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron T1600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T8100 and Celeron T1600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T8100
Core 2 Duo T8100
Intel Celeron T1600
Celeron T1600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 89 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 8 votes

Rate Celeron T1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T8100 or Celeron T1600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.