Athlon II X3 425 vs Core 2 Duo T8100

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T8100 and Athlon II X3 425 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2461
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.94
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duono data
Power efficiencyno data0.99
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Rana (2009−2011)
Release date10 January 2008 (16 years ago)20 October 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$209$42

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T8100 and Athlon II X3 425 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads23
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm2169 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million300 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T8100 and Athlon II X3 425 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA479,PGA478AM3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T8100 and Athlon II X3 425. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T8100 and Athlon II X3 425 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T8100 and Athlon II X3 425 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T8100 and Athlon II X3 425. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo T8100 and Athlon II X3 425.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T8100 768
Athlon II X3 425 1576
+105%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo T8100 272
Athlon II X3 425 276
+1.5%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo T8100 428
Athlon II X3 425 639
+49.3%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2008 20 October 2009
Physical cores 2 3
Threads 2 3
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

Core 2 Duo T8100 has 171.4% lower power consumption.

Athlon II X3 425, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo T8100 and Athlon II X3 425. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo T8100 is a notebook processor while Athlon II X3 425 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T8100 and Athlon II X3 425, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T8100
Core 2 Duo T8100
AMD Athlon II X3 425
Athlon II X3 425

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 87 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 77 votes

Rate Athlon II X3 425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T8100 or Athlon II X3 425, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.