Pentium 3558U vs Core 2 Duo T7700

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T7700
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.60
Pentium 3558U
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.64
+6.7%

Pentium 3558U outperforms Core 2 Duo T7700 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T7700 and Pentium 3558U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28092768
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Pentium
Power efficiency1.674.04
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date2 September 2007 (17 years ago)1 January 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$307$161

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T7700 and Pentium 3558U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB128 KB
L2 cache4 MB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography65 nm22 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T7700 and Pentium 3558U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPBGA479,PPGA478FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T7700 and Pentium 3558U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T7700 and Pentium 3558U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T7700 and Pentium 3558U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T7700 and Pentium 3558U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics (Haswell) (200 - 1000 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T7700 0.60
Pentium 3558U 0.64
+6.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T7700 951
Pentium 3558U 1025
+7.8%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo T7700 2554
+1.7%
Pentium 3558U 2510

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo T7700 4620
Pentium 3558U 4852
+5%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo T7700 2058
+6.9%
Pentium 3558U 1926

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.60 0.64
Recency 2 September 2007 1 January 2014
Chip lithography 65 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Pentium 3558U has a 6.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Duo T7700 and Pentium 3558U.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T7700 and Pentium 3558U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T7700
Core 2 Duo T7700
Intel Pentium 3558U
Pentium 3558U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 82 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 107 votes

Rate Pentium 3558U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T7700 or Pentium 3558U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.