Xeon D-1581 vs Core 2 Duo T7500

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T7500
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.52
Xeon D-1581
2016
16 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
8.36
+1508%

Xeon D-1581 outperforms Core 2 Duo T7500 by a whopping 1508% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T7500 and Xeon D-1581 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2859901
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Xeon D
Power efficiency1.4112.17
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date8 May 2007 (17 years ago)24 February 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$234no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T7500 and Xeon D-1581 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rate800 MHzno data
Multiplierno data18
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB1.5 MB (per core)
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size143 mm2306.18 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
Number of transistors291 Million3,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.075V - 1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T7500 and Xeon D-1581 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPBGA479,PPGA478FCBGA1667
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T7500 and Xeon D-1581. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
GPIOno data+
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T7500 and Xeon D-1581 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T7500 and Xeon D-1581 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T7500 and Xeon D-1581. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4, DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.124 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo T7500 and Xeon D-1581.

PCIe versionno data2.0/3.0
PCI Express lanesno data24
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data6
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data+
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T7500 0.52
Xeon D-1581 8.36
+1508%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T7500 828
Xeon D-1581 13282
+1504%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.52 8.36
Recency 8 May 2007 24 February 2016
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Core 2 Duo T7500 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon D-1581, on the other hand, has a 1507.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon D-1581 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo T7500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo T7500 is a notebook processor while Xeon D-1581 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T7500 and Xeon D-1581, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
Core 2 Duo T7500
Intel Xeon D-1581
Xeon D-1581

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 181 vote

Rate Core 2 Duo T7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 17 votes

Rate Xeon D-1581 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T7500 or Xeon D-1581, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.