EPYC 7H12 vs Core 2 Duo T7400

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T7400 and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated48
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data14.82
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date28 August 2006 (18 years ago)18 September 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$286no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T7400 and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2128
Base clock speed2.16 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.16 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
Multiplierno data26
L1 cache64 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size143 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors291 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range1.1625V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T7400 and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketPBGA479,PPGA478TR4
Power consumption (TDP)34 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T7400 and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T7400 and EPYC 7H12 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T7400 and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T7400 and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T7400 761
EPYC 7H12 69633
+9050%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 August 2006 18 September 2019
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 2 128
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 34 Watt 280 Watt

Core 2 Duo T7400 has 723.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7H12, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo T7400 and EPYC 7H12. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo T7400 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T7400 and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T7400
Core 2 Duo T7400
AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 52 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T7400 or EPYC 7H12, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.