Duron 1800 vs Core 2 Duo T6570

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T6570 and Duron 1800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoAMD Duron
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)K7 (2000−2004)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)15 August 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T6570 and Duron 1800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate800 MHz266.66 MT/s
Multiplierno data13.5
L2 cache2 MB64 KB
L3 cache2 MBno data
Chip lithography45 nm130 nm
Die size107 mm280.89 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million37 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T6570 and Duron 1800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPGA478no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt57 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T6570 and Duron 1800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T6570 and Duron 1800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T6570 and Duron 1800 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T6570 and Duron 1800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2009 15 August 2003
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 57 Watt

Core 2 Duo T6570 has an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 188.9% more advanced lithography process, and 62.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo T6570 and Duron 1800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo T6570 is a notebook processor while Duron 1800 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T6570 and Duron 1800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T6570
Core 2 Duo T6570
AMD Duron 1800
Duron 1800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 52 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T6570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 9 votes

Rate Duron 1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T6570 or Duron 1800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.