Core 2 Quad Q8400 vs Core 2 Duo T6400

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T6400 and Core 2 Quad Q8400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2268
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duono data
Power efficiencyno data1.30
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)19 April 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T6400 and Core 2 Quad Q8400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz0.67 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz1333 MHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB4 MB (shared)
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data2x 82 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistorsno data456 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.25V0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T6400 and Core 2 Quad Q8400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA478FCLGA775,LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T6400 and Core 2 Quad Q8400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T6400 and Core 2 Quad Q8400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T6400 and Core 2 Quad Q8400 are enumerated here.

VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T6400 and Core 2 Quad Q8400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo T6400 and Core 2 Quad Q8400.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T6400 727
Core 2 Quad Q8400 2067
+184%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo T6400 232
Core 2 Quad Q8400 328
+41.4%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo T6400 359
Core 2 Quad Q8400 896
+150%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2009 19 April 2009
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

Core 2 Duo T6400 has 171.4% lower power consumption.

Core 2 Quad Q8400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo T6400 and Core 2 Quad Q8400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo T6400 is a notebook processor while Core 2 Quad Q8400 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T6400 and Core 2 Quad Q8400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T6400
Core 2 Duo T6400
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400
Core 2 Quad Q8400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 88 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T6400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1340 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q8400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T6400 or Core 2 Quad Q8400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.