Atom N2850 vs Core 2 Duo T6400
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo T6400 and Atom N2850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | Intel Atom |
Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) |
Release date | 1 January 2009 (15 years ago) | 5 January 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo T6400 and Atom N2850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 2 MB L2 Cache | no data |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | 1V-1.25V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo T6400 and Atom N2850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | PGA478 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 6,6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T6400 and Atom N2850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo T6400 and Atom N2850 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T6400 and Atom N2850 are enumerated here.
VT-x | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 January 2009 | 5 January 2012 |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 6 Watt |
Atom N2850 has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more threads, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo T6400 and Atom N2850. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T6400 and Atom N2850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.