Core 2 Duo T7400 vs Core 2 Duo T5850

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T5850
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 34 Watt
0.43
Core 2 Duo T7400
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 34 Watt
0.48
+11.6%

Core 2 Duo T7400 outperforms Core 2 Duo T5850 by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T5850 and Core 2 Duo T7400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29492899
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency1.201.34
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date1 October 2008 (16 years ago)28 August 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$286

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T5850 and Core 2 Duo T7400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2.16 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2.16 GHz
Bus rate667 MHz667 MHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB
L2 cache2 MB4 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data143 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.1625V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T5850 and Core 2 Duo T7400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataPBGA479,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)34 Watt34 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T5850 and Core 2 Duo T7400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T5850 and Core 2 Duo T7400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T5850 and Core 2 Duo T7400 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T5850 0.43
Core 2 Duo T7400 0.48
+11.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T5850 687
Core 2 Duo T7400 761
+10.8%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo T5850 219
Core 2 Duo T7400 285
+30.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo T5850 333
Core 2 Duo T7400 483
+45%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo T5850 1768
Core 2 Duo T7400 1861
+5.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.43 0.48
Recency 1 October 2008 28 August 2006

Core 2 Duo T5850 has an age advantage of 2 years.

Core 2 Duo T7400, on the other hand, has a 11.6% higher aggregate performance score.

The Core 2 Duo T7400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo T5850 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T5850 and Core 2 Duo T7400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T5850
Core 2 Duo T5850
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400
Core 2 Duo T7400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 25 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T5850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 52 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T7400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T5850 or Core 2 Duo T7400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.