Mobile Sempron 3400+ vs Core 2 Duo T5670

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T5670
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.37
+118%
Mobile Sempron 3400+
1 core / 1 thread, 62 Watt
0.17

Core 2 Duo T5670 outperforms Mobile Sempron 3400+ by a whopping 118% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T5670 and Mobile Sempron 3400+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30393280
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoMobile Sempron
Power efficiency1.000.26
Architecture codenameMerom-2M (2008)Albany
Release date1 March 2008 (16 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T5670 and Mobile Sempron 3400+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz800 MHz
L2 cache2 MBno data
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography65 nmno data
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.0375V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T5670 and Mobile Sempron 3400+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt62 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T5670 and Mobile Sempron 3400+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T5670 and Mobile Sempron 3400+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T5670 and Mobile Sempron 3400+ are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T5670 0.37
+118%
Mobile Sempron 3400+ 0.17

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T5670 590
+119%
Mobile Sempron 3400+ 269

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo T5670 1500
+126%
Mobile Sempron 3400+ 664

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.37 0.17
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 62 Watt

Core 2 Duo T5670 has a 117.6% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 77.1% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Duo T5670 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron 3400+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T5670 and Mobile Sempron 3400+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T5670
Core 2 Duo T5670
AMD Mobile Sempron 3400+
Mobile Sempron 3400+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 35 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T5670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 3 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T5670 or Mobile Sempron 3400+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.