Mobile Sempron SI-40 vs Core 2 Duo T5450
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Duo T5450 outperforms Mobile Sempron SI-40 by an impressive 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo T5450 and Mobile Sempron SI-40 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3047 | 3239 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Core 2 Duo | AMD Mobile Sempron |
| Power efficiency | 1.02 | 0.75 |
| Architecture codename | Merom-2048 (2006−2008) | Sable (2008−2009) |
| Release date | no data | 4 July 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo T5450 and Mobile Sempron SI-40 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.66 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.66 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB L2 Cache | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.075V-1.25V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo T5450 and Mobile Sempron SI-40 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PPGA478 | S1g2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T5450 and Mobile Sempron SI-40. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125V |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo T5450 and Mobile Sempron SI-40 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T5450 and Mobile Sempron SI-40 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.37 | 0.20 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
Core 2 Duo T5450 has a 85% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Mobile Sempron SI-40, on the other hand, has 40% lower power consumption.
The Core 2 Duo T5450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron SI-40 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T5450 and Mobile Sempron SI-40, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
