Turion 64 ML-28 vs Core 2 Duo SU9300

Place in the ranking	3105	3296
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Core 2 Duo	Turion 64
Power efficiency	2.93	0.43
Architecture codename	Penryn (2008−2011)	Lancaster (2005−2006)
Release date	20 August 2008 (16 years ago)	June 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo SU9300 and Turion 64 ML-28 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	2	1
Base clock speed	1.2 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1.2 GHz	1.6 GHz
Bus rate	800 MHz	800 MHz
L1 cache	no data	128 KB
L2 cache	3 MB	512 KB
L3 cache	3 MB L2 Cache	0 KB
Chip lithography	45 nm	90 nm
Die size	107 mm²	125 mm²
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	no data
Number of transistors	410 Million	114 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	1.05V-1.15V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo SU9300 and Turion 64 ML-28 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1
Socket	BGA956	754
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SU9300 and Turion 64 ML-28. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
FSB parity	-	no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo SU9300 and Turion 64 ML-28 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SU9300 and Turion 64 ML-28 are enumerated here.

VT-x

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo SU9300 0.31
+93.8%

Turion 64 ML-28 0.16

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo SU9300 1392
+15.9%

Turion 64 ML-28 1201

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo SU9300 1028
+81.6%

Turion 64 ML-28 566

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.31	0.16
Physical cores	2	1
Threads	2	1
Chip lithography	45 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	35 Watt

Core 2 Duo SU9300 has a 93.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Duo SU9300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 ML-28 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SU9300 and Turion 64 ML-28, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.