Phenom II X4 P920 vs Core 2 Duo SP9300

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo SP9300
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.61
Phenom II X4 P920
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
0.85
+39.3%

Phenom II X4 P920 outperforms Core 2 Duo SP9300 by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo SP9300 and Phenom II X4 P920 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27802560
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duo4x AMD Phenom II
Power efficiency2.303.20
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date20 August 2008 (16 years ago)12 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$284no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo SP9300 and Phenom II X4 P920 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.26 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.26 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cacheno data512 KB
L2 cache6 MB2 MB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.05V - 1.15Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo SP9300 and Phenom II X4 P920 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA956S1 (S1g4)
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SP9300 and Phenom II X4 P920. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, 3DNow, SSE (1,2,3,4A), AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, HyperTransport 3.0
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo SP9300 and Phenom II X4 P920 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SP9300 and Phenom II X4 P920 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo SP9300 and Phenom II X4 P920. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo SP9300 0.61
Phenom II X4 P920 0.85
+39.3%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo SP9300 2517
+80.4%
Phenom II X4 P920 1395

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo SP9300 4757
Phenom II X4 P920 5042
+6%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo SP9300 1974
Phenom II X4 P920 2083
+5.5%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Core 2 Duo SP9300 52.68
Phenom II X4 P920 24
+120%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.61 0.85
Recency 20 August 2008 12 May 2010
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4

Phenom II X4 P920 has a 39.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Phenom II X4 P920 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo SP9300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SP9300 and Phenom II X4 P920, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300
Core 2 Duo SP9300
AMD Phenom II X4 P920
Phenom II X4 P920

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo SP9300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 35 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 P920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo SP9300 or Phenom II X4 P920, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.