Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Core 2 Duo SL9600
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo SL9600 and Core 2 Duo P7350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | Intel Core 2 Duo |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | 1 March 2009 (15 years ago) | 15 July 2008 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $316 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo SL9600 and Core 2 Duo P7350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.13 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1066 MHz | 1066 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 3 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 3 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.05V-1.15V | 1.062V-1.15V |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo SL9600 and Core 2 Duo P7350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA956 | BGA479,PGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SL9600 and Core 2 Duo P7350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | - |
| FSB parity | - | - |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo SL9600 and Core 2 Duo P7350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | - |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SL9600 and Core 2 Duo P7350 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 March 2009 | 15 July 2008 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 25 Watt |
Core 2 Duo SL9600 has an age advantage of 7 months, and 47.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo SL9600 and Core 2 Duo P7350. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SL9600 and Core 2 Duo P7350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
