Xeon Gold 5418Y vs Core 2 Duo SL9400

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo SL9400
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.48
Xeon Gold 5418Y
2023
24 cores / 48 threads, 185 Watt
28.01
+5735%

Xeon Gold 5418Y outperforms Core 2 Duo SL9400 by a whopping 5735% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo SL9400 and Xeon Gold 5418Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2902166
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data54.33
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duono data
Power efficiency2.6714.33
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date20 August 2008 (16 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$284$1,493

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo SL9400 and Xeon Gold 5418Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed1.86 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache45 MB
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1.05V - 1.15Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo SL9400 and Xeon Gold 5418Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketBGA956FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SL9400 and Xeon Gold 5418Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo SL9400 and Xeon Gold 5418Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SL9400 and Xeon Gold 5418Y are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo SL9400 and Xeon Gold 5418Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4400
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo SL9400 and Xeon Gold 5418Y.

PCIe versionno data5
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo SL9400 0.48
Xeon Gold 5418Y 28.01
+5735%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo SL9400 759
Xeon Gold 5418Y 44487
+5761%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.48 28.01
Recency 20 August 2008 10 January 2023
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 48
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 185 Watt

Core 2 Duo SL9400 has 988.2% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5418Y, on the other hand, has a 5735.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 5418Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo SL9400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo SL9400 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 5418Y is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SL9400 and Xeon Gold 5418Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400
Core 2 Duo SL9400
Intel Xeon Gold 5418Y
Xeon Gold 5418Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo SL9400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5418Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo SL9400 or Xeon Gold 5418Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.