Athlon II X4 641 vs Core 2 Duo P8700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo P8700
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.63
Athlon II X4 641
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.51
+140%

Athlon II X4 641 outperforms Core 2 Duo P8700 by a whopping 140% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo P8700 and Athlon II X4 641 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27822159
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duono data
Power efficiency2.301.38
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)6 February 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$209no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo P8700 and Athlon II X4 641 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.53 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size107 mm2228 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V - 1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo P8700 and Athlon II X4 641 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA479,PGA478FM1
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P8700 and Athlon II X4 641. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo P8700 and Athlon II X4 641 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P8700 and Athlon II X4 641 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo P8700 and Athlon II X4 641. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo P8700 0.63
Athlon II X4 641 1.51
+140%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo P8700 960
Athlon II X4 641 2313
+141%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo P8700 302
Athlon II X4 641 374
+23.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo P8700 490
Athlon II X4 641 1256
+156%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.63 1.51
Recency 1 January 2009 6 February 2012
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 100 Watt

Core 2 Duo P8700 has 300% lower power consumption.

Athlon II X4 641, on the other hand, has a 139.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Athlon II X4 641 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo P8700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo P8700 is a notebook processor while Athlon II X4 641 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo P8700 and Athlon II X4 641, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo P8700
Core 2 Duo P8700
AMD Athlon II X4 641
Athlon II X4 641

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 172 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P8700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 145 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 641 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo P8700 or Athlon II X4 641, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.