Turion X2 RM-72 vs Core 2 Duo P8600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo P8600
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.53
+20.5%
Turion X2 RM-72
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.44

Core 2 Duo P8600 outperforms Turion X2 RM-72 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo P8600 and Turion X2 RM-72 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28602958
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duo2x AMD Turion
Power efficiency2.011.19
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Puma (2008−2009)
Release date15 July 2008 (16 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$209no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo P8600 and Turion X2 RM-72 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cache128 KB256 KB
L2 cache3 MB1 MB
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors274 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.05V-1.15Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo P8600 and Turion X2 RM-72 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA479,PBGA479,PGA478S1
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P8600 and Turion X2 RM-72. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo P8600 and Turion X2 RM-72 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P8600 and Turion X2 RM-72 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo P8600 0.53
+20.5%
Turion X2 RM-72 0.44

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo P8600 2618
+60.9%
Turion X2 RM-72 1627

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo P8600 4910
+54.7%
Turion X2 RM-72 3174

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo P8600 2155
+40.5%
Turion X2 RM-72 1534

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 0.44
Recency 15 July 2008 1 January 2009
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 35 Watt

Core 2 Duo P8600 has a 20.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

Turion X2 RM-72, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months.

The Core 2 Duo P8600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 RM-72 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo P8600 and Turion X2 RM-72, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo P8600
Core 2 Duo P8600
AMD Turion X2 RM-72
Turion X2 RM-72

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 148 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P8600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 53 votes

Rate Turion X2 RM-72 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo P8600 or Turion X2 RM-72, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.