Athlon X2 L310 vs Core 2 Duo L7700

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo L7700
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.38
+81%
Athlon X2 L310
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 13 Watt
0.21

Core 2 Duo L7700 outperforms Athlon X2 L310 by an impressive 81% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo L7700 and Athlon X2 L310 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30263216
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore 2 Duo2x AMD Athlon
Power efficiency2.111.53
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Conesus (2009)
Release dateno data10 September 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo L7700 and Athlon X2 L310 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz800 MHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache4 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.9V-1.2Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo L7700 and Athlon X2 L310 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataBGA / 638 lidless micro-PGA
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt13 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo L7700 and Athlon X2 L310. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Virtualization, Enhanced Virus Protection
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo L7700 and Athlon X2 L310 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo L7700 and Athlon X2 L310 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo L7700 0.38
+81%
Athlon X2 L310 0.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo L7700 607
+81.2%
Athlon X2 L310 335

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo L7700 257
+122%
Athlon X2 L310 116

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo L7700 455
+129%
Athlon X2 L310 199

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.38 0.21
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 13 Watt

Core 2 Duo L7700 has a 81% higher aggregate performance score.

Athlon X2 L310, on the other hand, has 30.8% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Duo L7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X2 L310 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo L7700 and Athlon X2 L310, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo L7700
Core 2 Duo L7700
AMD Athlon X2 L310
Athlon X2 L310

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 2 Duo L7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 12 votes

Rate Athlon X2 L310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo L7700 or Athlon X2 L310, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.