Xeon Gold 6538N vs Core 2 Duo L7300

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo L7300
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.34
Xeon Gold 6538N
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
28.26
+8212%

Xeon Gold 6538N outperforms Core 2 Duo L7300 by a whopping 8212% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo L7300 and Xeon Gold 6538N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3062164
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data21.85
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCore 2 Duono data
Power efficiency1.8913.05
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,351

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo L7300 and Xeon Gold 6538N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speed1.4 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB L2 Cache60 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data2x 763 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data85 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.975V-1.062Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo L7300 and Xeon Gold 6538N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketPBGA479FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo L7300 and Xeon Gold 6538N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo L7300 and Xeon Gold 6538N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo L7300 and Xeon Gold 6538N are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo L7300 and Xeon Gold 6538N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-5200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo L7300 and Xeon Gold 6538N.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo L7300 0.34
Xeon Gold 6538N 28.26
+8212%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo L7300 536
Xeon Gold 6538N 44895
+8276%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 28.26
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 205 Watt

Core 2 Duo L7300 has 1105.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6538N, on the other hand, has a 8211.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 6538N is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo L7300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo L7300 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6538N is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo L7300 and Xeon Gold 6538N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo L7300
Core 2 Duo L7300
Intel Xeon Gold 6538N
Xeon Gold 6538N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 2 Duo L7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6538N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo L7300 or Xeon Gold 6538N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.