Core 2 Duo SP9600 vs Core 2 Duo E8600
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Duo E8600 outperforms Core 2 Duo SP9600 by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo E8600 and Core 2 Duo SP9600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2554 | 2695 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Core 2 Duo |
| Power efficiency | 1.27 | 2.69 |
| Architecture codename | Wolfdale (2008−2010) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | August 2008 (16 years ago) | 1 March 2009 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $316 |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo E8600 and Core 2 Duo SP9600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.33 GHz | 2.53 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.33 GHz | 2.53 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1333 MHz | 1066 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 6 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 million | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | 1.05V-1.15V |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo E8600 and Core 2 Duo SP9600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | LGA775 | BGA479,BGA956,PBGA479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E8600 and Core 2 Duo SP9600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | - |
| FSB parity | - | - |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo E8600 and Core 2 Duo SP9600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E8600 and Core 2 Duo SP9600 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E8600 and Core 2 Duo SP9600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.87 | 0.71 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 25 Watt |
Core 2 Duo E8600 has a 22.5% higher aggregate performance score.
Core 2 Duo SP9600, on the other hand, has 160% lower power consumption.
The Core 2 Duo E8600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo SP9600 in performance tests.
Note that Core 2 Duo E8600 is a desktop processor while Core 2 Duo SP9600 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E8600 and Core 2 Duo SP9600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
