Atom E680 vs Core 2 Duo E8400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo E8400
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.73
+232%
Atom E680
2010
1 core / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.22

Core 2 Duo E8400 outperforms Atom E680 by a whopping 232% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E8400 and Atom E680 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26863203
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency1.065.21
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Tunnel Creek (2010)
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)14 September 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E8400 and Atom E680 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache6 MB (shared)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size104 mm226 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 million47 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E8400 and Atom E680 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775Intel BGA 676
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E8400 and Atom E680. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E8400 and Atom E680 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E8400 and Atom E680 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E8400 and Atom E680. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel GMA 600

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo E8400 and Atom E680.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo E8400 0.73
+232%
Atom E680 0.22

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo E8400 1165
+237%
Atom E680 346

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.73 0.22
Recency 1 January 2008 14 September 2010
Physical cores 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 4 Watt

Core 2 Duo E8400 has a 231.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores.

Atom E680, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 1525% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Duo E8400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom E680 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Duo E8400 is a desktop processor while Atom E680 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E8400 and Atom E680, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
Core 2 Duo E8400
Intel Atom E680
Atom E680

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 2294 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E8400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom E680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E8400 or Atom E680, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.