A6-9220e vs Core 2 Duo E8400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo E8400
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.73
+17.7%
A6-9220e
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.62

Core 2 Duo E8400 outperforms A6-9220e by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E8400 and A6-9220e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26712779
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency1.069.78
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)1 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E8400 and A6-9220e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)160 KB
L2 cache6 MB (shared)1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size104 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E8400 and A6-9220e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA775BGA
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E8400 and A6-9220e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E8400 and A6-9220e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E8400 and A6-9220e are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E8400 and A6-9220e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo E8400 and A6-9220e.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo E8400 0.73
+17.7%
A6-9220e 0.62

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo E8400 1165
+19.2%
A6-9220e 977

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.73 0.62
Recency 1 January 2008 1 June 2017
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 6 Watt

Core 2 Duo E8400 has a 17.7% higher aggregate performance score.

A6-9220e, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 983.3% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Duo E8400 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9220e in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Duo E8400 is a desktop processor while A6-9220e is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E8400 and A6-9220e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
Core 2 Duo E8400
AMD A6-9220e
A6-9220e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 2278 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E8400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 315 votes

Rate A6-9220e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E8400 or A6-9220e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.