A6-4400M vs Core 2 Duo E8235

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo E8235
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 44 Watt
0.64
A6-4400M
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.64

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E8235 and A6-4400M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27692775
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency1.381.73
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date3 March 2009 (15 years ago)15 May 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E8235 and A6-4400M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96 KB
L2 cache6 MB (shared)1 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size107 mm2246 mm2
Number of transistors410 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E8235 and A6-4400M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPFS1r2
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E8235 and A6-4400M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E8235 and A6-4400M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E8235 and A6-4400M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E8235 and A6-4400M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3unknown

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon HD 7520G (496 - 685 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo E8235 0.64
A6-4400M 0.64

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo E8235 1020
+0.7%
A6-4400M 1013

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo E8235 379
+20.7%
A6-4400M 314

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo E8235 662
+66.3%
A6-4400M 398

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 March 2009 15 May 2012
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 35 Watt

A6-4400M has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 25.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Duo E8235 and A6-4400M.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E8235 and A6-4400M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E8235
Core 2 Duo E8235
AMD A6-4400M
A6-4400M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 2 Duo E8235 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 188 votes

Rate A6-4400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E8235 or A6-4400M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.