Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Core 2 Duo E8200

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo E8200
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.72
+16.1%
Athlon 64 FX-74
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 125 Watt
0.62

Core 2 Duo E8200 outperforms Athlon 64 FX-74 by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E8200 and Athlon 64 FX-74 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26962782
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.13
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.030.46
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release dateJanuary 2008 (16 years ago)November 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$500

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E8200 and Athlon 64 FX-74 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.66 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache6 MB (shared)1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size107 mm2235 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 million227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E8200 and Athlon 64 FX-74 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775F
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E8200 and Athlon 64 FX-74. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E8200 and Athlon 64 FX-74 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E8200 and Athlon 64 FX-74 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E8200 and Athlon 64 FX-74. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo E8200 0.72
+16.1%
Athlon 64 FX-74 0.62

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo E8200 1124
+15.6%
Athlon 64 FX-74 972

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.72 0.62
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 125 Watt

Core 2 Duo E8200 has a 16.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Duo E8200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 FX-74 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E8200 and Athlon 64 FX-74, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Core 2 Duo E8200
AMD Athlon 64 FX-74
Athlon 64 FX-74

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 130 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-74 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E8200 or Athlon 64 FX-74, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.