A4 Micro-6400T vs Core 2 Duo E7300

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo E7300
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.60
A4 Micro-6400T
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
0.68
+13.3%

A4 Micro-6400T outperforms Core 2 Duo E7300 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E7300 and A4 Micro-6400T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27942721
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency0.8714.30
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Mullins (2014)
Release dateAugust 2008 (16 years ago)29 April 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E7300 and A4 Micro-6400T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.66 GHz1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache3 MB (shared)2048 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors420 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E7300 and A4 Micro-6400T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA775FT3b
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt4.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E7300 and A4 Micro-6400T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E7300 and A4 Micro-6400T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E7300 and A4 Micro-6400T are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E7300 and A4 Micro-6400T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3-1333
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Duo E7300 and A4 Micro-6400T integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core 2 Duo E7300 and A4 Micro-6400T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo E7300 and A4 Micro-6400T.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo E7300 0.60
A4 Micro-6400T 0.68
+13.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo E7300 946
A4 Micro-6400T 1082
+14.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.60 0.68
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 4 Watt

A4 Micro-6400T has a 13.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 1525% lower power consumption.

The A4 Micro-6400T is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E7300 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Duo E7300 is a desktop processor while A4 Micro-6400T is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E7300 and A4 Micro-6400T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E7300
Core 2 Duo E7300
AMD A4 Micro-6400T
A4 Micro-6400T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 159 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate A4 Micro-6400T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E7300 or A4 Micro-6400T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.