A4-4000 vs Core 2 Duo E7300

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo E7300
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.60
A4-4000
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.72
+20%

A4-4000 outperforms Core 2 Duo E7300 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E7300 and A4-4000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27942684
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.871.05
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Richland (2013−2014)
Release dateAugust 2008 (16 years ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E7300 and A4-4000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.66 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size107 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C70 °C
Number of transistors420 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E7300 and A4-4000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FM2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E7300 and A4-4000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E7300 and A4-4000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E7300 and A4-4000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E7300 and A4-4000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 7480D

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo E7300 0.60
A4-4000 0.72
+20%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo E7300 946
A4-4000 1146
+21.1%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo E7300 309
A4-4000 330
+6.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo E7300 506
+9.1%
A4-4000 464

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.60 0.72
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm

A4-4000 has a 20% higher aggregate performance score, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The A4-4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E7300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E7300 and A4-4000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E7300
Core 2 Duo E7300
AMD A4-4000
A4-4000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 159 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 358 votes

Rate A4-4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E7300 or A4-4000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.