EPYC 7453 vs Core 2 Duo E7200

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo E7200
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.63
EPYC 7453
2021
28 cores / 56 threads, 225 Watt
31.84
+4954%

EPYC 7453 outperforms Core 2 Duo E7200 by a whopping 4954% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E7200 and EPYC 7453 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2773128
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data16.50
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency0.9213.39
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Milan (2021−2023)
Release dateApril 2008 (16 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,570

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E7200 and EPYC 7453 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads256
Base clock speed2.53 GHz2.75 GHz
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz3.45 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
Multiplierno data27.5
L1 cache64 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB (shared)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm+
Die size82 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors228 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E7200 and EPYC 7453 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketLGA775SP3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E7200 and EPYC 7453. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E7200 and EPYC 7453 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E7200 and EPYC 7453 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E7200 and EPYC 7453. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo E7200 and EPYC 7453.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo E7200 0.63
EPYC 7453 31.84
+4954%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo E7200 993
EPYC 7453 50575
+4993%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.63 31.84
Physical cores 2 28
Threads 2 56
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 225 Watt

Core 2 Duo E7200 has 246.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7453, on the other hand, has a 4954% higher aggregate performance score, 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7453 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E7200 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Duo E7200 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7453 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E7200 and EPYC 7453, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E7200
Core 2 Duo E7200
AMD EPYC 7453
EPYC 7453

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 216 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7453 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E7200 or EPYC 7453, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.