Xeon E3-1501M v6 vs Core 2 Duo E6600
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6600 and Xeon E3-1501M v6 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2800 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Mobile workstation |
| Series | Core 2 Duo (Desktop) | Intel Xeon E3 |
| Power efficiency | 0.84 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Conroe (2006−2007) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 12 June 2017 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6600 and Xeon E3-1501M v6 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | 1066 MHz | 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 29 |
| L1 cache | no data | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 6 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6600 and Xeon E3-1501M v6 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6600 and Xeon E3-1501M v6. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6600 and Xeon E3-1501M v6 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6600 and Xeon E3-1501M v6 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6600 and Xeon E3-1501M v6. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 38.397 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics P630 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6600 and Xeon E3-1501M v6.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 45 Watt |
Xeon E3-1501M v6 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 44.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo E6600 and Xeon E3-1501M v6. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core 2 Duo E6600 is a desktop processor while Xeon E3-1501M v6 is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6600 and Xeon E3-1501M v6, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
