Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 vs Core 2 Duo E6600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6600 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2808not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesCore 2 Duo (Desktop)Transmeta Crusoe
Power efficiency0.84no data
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Crusoe (2001)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)1 June 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6600 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHz266 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data512 KB
Chip lithography65 nm130 nm
Die sizeno data55 mm2
Number of transistorsno data36.8 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6600 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataCBGA-474
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt7 Watt

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Core 2 Duo E6600 36.2
+1273%
Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 497

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 7 Watt

Core 2 Duo E6600 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800, on the other hand, has 828.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo E6600 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Duo E6600 is a desktop processor while Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6600 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
Core 2 Duo E6600
Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800
Crusoe TM-5800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 432 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 93 votes

Rate Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E6600 or Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.