Ryzen 5 8400F vs Core 2 Duo E6320

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo E6320
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.45
Ryzen 5 8400F
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
15.13
+3262%

Ryzen 5 8400F outperforms Core 2 Duo E6320 by a whopping 3262% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E6320 and Ryzen 5 8400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2930459
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data60.25
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.6622.03
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Phoenix (2023−2024)
Release dateApril 2007 (17 years ago)1 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$170

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E6320 and Ryzen 5 8400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.86 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm4 nm
Die size143 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature60 °Cno data
Number of transistors291 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E6320 and Ryzen 5 8400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPLGA775AM5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E6320 and Ryzen 5 8400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E6320 and Ryzen 5 8400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E6320 and Ryzen 5 8400F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E6320 and Ryzen 5 8400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo E6320 and Ryzen 5 8400F.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo E6320 0.45
Ryzen 5 8400F 15.13
+3262%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo E6320 717
Ryzen 5 8400F 24031
+3252%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.45 15.13
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm

Ryzen 5 8400F has a 3262.2% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 8400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E6320 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6320 and Ryzen 5 8400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E6320
Core 2 Duo E6320
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
Ryzen 5 8400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 61 vote

Rate Core 2 Duo E6320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 239 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 8400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E6320 or Ryzen 5 8400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.