Phenom X4 9550 vs Core 2 Duo E6320

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E6320 and Phenom X4 9550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2423
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data1.04
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Agena (2007−2008)
Release dateApril 2007 (17 years ago)March 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E6320 and Phenom X4 9550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.86 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die size143 mm2285 mm2
Maximum core temperature60 °Cno data
Number of transistors291 million450 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E6320 and Phenom X4 9550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPLGA775AM2+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E6320 and Phenom X4 9550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E6320 and Phenom X4 9550 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E6320 and Phenom X4 9550 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E6320 and Phenom X4 9550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo E6320 717
Phenom X4 9550 1656
+131%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo E6320 213
Phenom X4 9550 237
+11.3%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo E6320 356
Phenom X4 9550 729
+105%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

Core 2 Duo E6320 has 46.2% lower power consumption.

Phenom X4 9550, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo E6320 and Phenom X4 9550. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6320 and Phenom X4 9550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E6320
Core 2 Duo E6320
AMD Phenom X4 9550
Phenom X4 9550

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 61 vote

Rate Core 2 Duo E6320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 142 votes

Rate Phenom X4 9550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E6320 or Phenom X4 9550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.