FX-4170 vs Core 2 Duo E6300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E6300 and FX-4170 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1958
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data1.45
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release dateJuly 2006 (18 years ago)27 February 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E6300 and FX-4170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.86 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB192 KB
L2 cache2 MB4096 KB
L3 cache0 KB8192 KB
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die size143 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °C61 °C
Number of transistors291 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.1875 V - Max: 1.4125 V
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E6300 and FX-4170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775,PLGA775AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E6300 and FX-4170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E6300 and FX-4170 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E6300 and FX-4170 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E6300 and FX-4170. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo E6300 and FX-4170.

PCIe versionno datan/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo E6300 640
FX-4170 3034
+374%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo E6300 186
FX-4170 464
+149%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo E6300 304
FX-4170 1201
+295%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 125 Watt

Core 2 Duo E6300 has 92.3% lower power consumption.

FX-4170, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo E6300 and FX-4170. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6300 and FX-4170, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E6300
Core 2 Duo E6300
AMD FX-4170
FX-4170

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 217 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 78 votes

Rate FX-4170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E6300 or FX-4170, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.