Celeron N4020 vs Core 2 Duo E4500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E4500 and Celeron N4020 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated2388
Place by popularitynot in top-10056
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Gemini Lake
Architecture codenameAllendale (2006−2009)Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)
Release dateJuly 2007 (17 years ago)4 November 2019 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E4500 and Celeron N4020 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache2 MB4 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size111 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors167 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E4500 and Celeron N4020 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket775BGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E4500 and Celeron N4020. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E4500 and Celeron N4020. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 600

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo E4500 and Celeron N4020.

PCI Express lanesno data6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Duo E4500 739
Celeron N4020 1551
+110%

Celeron N4020 outperforms Core 2 Duo E4500 by 110% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 41%

Core 2 Duo E4500 231
Celeron N4020 342
+48.1%

Celeron N4020 outperforms Core 2 Duo E4500 by 48% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 41%

Core 2 Duo E4500 378
Celeron N4020 544
+43.9%

Celeron N4020 outperforms Core 2 Duo E4500 by 44% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron N4020 has a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 983.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo E4500 and Celeron N4020. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Duo E4500 is a desktop processor while Celeron N4020 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E4500 and Celeron N4020, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E4500
Core 2 Duo E4500
Intel Celeron N4020
Celeron N4020

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 316 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 1612 votes

Rate Celeron N4020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E4500 or Celeron N4020, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.