Xeon w7-3555 vs Celeron U3400

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron U3400 and Xeon w7-3555 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameWestmere (2010−2011)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date24 May 2010 (14 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,339

Detailed specifications

Celeron U3400 and Xeon w7-3555 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads256
Base clock speed1.06 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier8no data
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB75 MB
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size81 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
Number of transistors382 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron U3400 and Xeon w7-3555 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt325 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron U3400 and Xeon w7-3555. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron U3400 and Xeon w7-3555 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron U3400 and Xeon w7-3555 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron U3400 and Xeon w7-3555. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size8 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsN/A
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron U3400 and Xeon w7-3555 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron U3400 and Xeon w7-3555.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes16112

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 May 2010 24 August 2024
Physical cores 2 28
Threads 2 56
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 325 Watt

Celeron U3400 has 1705.6% lower power consumption.

Xeon w7-3555, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, and 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron U3400 and Xeon w7-3555. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron U3400 is a notebook processor while Xeon w7-3555 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron U3400 and Xeon w7-3555, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron U3400
Celeron U3400
Intel Xeon w7-3555
Xeon w7-3555

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 30 votes

Rate Celeron U3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w7-3555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron U3400 or Xeon w7-3555, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.