Ryzen 5 4680U vs Celeron U3400

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron U3400 and Ryzen 5 4680U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated918
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Power efficiencyno data51.49
Architecture codenameWestmere (2010−2011)Renoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021)
Release date24 May 2010 (14 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron U3400 and Ryzen 5 4680U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.06 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier821
L1 cache128 KB384 KB
L2 cache512 KB3 MB
L3 cache2 MB8 MB
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size81 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors382 Million9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron U3400 and Ryzen 5 4680U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketBGA1288FP6
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron U3400 and Ryzen 5 4680U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
AES-NI-+
FMA++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron U3400 and Ryzen 5 4680U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron U3400 and Ryzen 5 4680U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron U3400 and Ryzen 5 4680U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB64 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/s68.27 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon Vega 7
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron U3400 and Ryzen 5 4680U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron U3400 and Ryzen 5 4680U.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron U3400 516
Ryzen 5 4680U 12959
+2411%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 May 2010 13 April 2021
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 4680U has an age advantage of 10 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron U3400 and Ryzen 5 4680U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron U3400 and Ryzen 5 4680U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron U3400
Celeron U3400
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U
Ryzen 5 4680U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 30 votes

Rate Celeron U3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 54 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 4680U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron U3400 or Ryzen 5 4680U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.