Processor 300 vs Celeron U3400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron U3400
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.32
Processor 300
2024
2 cores / 4 threads, 46 Watt
4.51
+1309%

Processor 300 outperforms Celeron U3400 by a whopping 1309% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron U3400 and Processor 300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30921319
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency1.689.28
Architecture codenameWestmere (2010−2011)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date24 May 2010 (14 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$82

Detailed specifications

Celeron U3400 and Processor 300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.06 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier8no data
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size81 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors382 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron U3400 and Processor 300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron U3400 and Processor 300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron U3400 and Processor 300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron U3400 and Processor 300 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron U3400 and Processor 300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/s76.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics 710
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency500 MHz1.45 GHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron U3400 and Processor 300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported24

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron U3400 and Processor 300 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron U3400 and Processor 300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron U3400 and Processor 300.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron U3400 0.32
Processor 300 4.51
+1309%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron U3400 516
Processor 300 7160
+1288%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.32 4.51
Integrated graphics card 0.77 2.85
Recency 24 May 2010 8 January 2024
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 46 Watt

Celeron U3400 has 155.6% lower power consumption.

Processor 300, on the other hand, has a 1309.4% higher aggregate performance score, 270.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 13 years, and 100% more threads.

The Processor 300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron U3400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron U3400 is a notebook processor while Processor 300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron U3400 and Processor 300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron U3400
Celeron U3400
Intel Processor 300
Processor 300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 30 votes

Rate Celeron U3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 24 votes

Rate Processor 300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron U3400 or Processor 300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.