N100 vs Celeron U3400

Primary details

Comparing Celeron U3400 and N100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	not rated	1536
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron	no data
Power efficiency	no data	54.57
Architecture codename	Westmere (2010−2011)	no data
Release date	24 May 2010 (14 years ago)	1 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron U3400 and N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	no data
Threads	2	4
Base clock speed	1.06 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	0.07 GHz	3.4 GHz
Bus type	DMI 1.0	no data
Bus rate	1 × 2.5 GT/s	no data
Multiplier	8	no data
L1 cache	128 KB	no data
L2 cache	512 KB	no data
L3 cache	2 MB	6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography	32 nm	Intel 7 nm
Die size	81 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	105 °C
Number of transistors	382 Million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron U3400 and N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	BGA1288	FCBGA1264
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron U3400 and N100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI	-	+
FMA	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Speed Shift	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	-
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	+
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
PAE	36 Bit	no data
GPIO	no data	+
FDI	+	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data

Security technologies

Celeron U3400 and N100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data
OS Guard	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron U3400 and N100 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron U3400 and N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3-800	DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size	8 GB	16 GB
Max memory channels	2	1
Maximum memory bandwidth	12.799 GB/s	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors	Intel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video	-	+
Clear Video	+	no data
Graphics max frequency	500 MHz	750 MHz
Execution Units	no data	24

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron U3400 and N100 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

2

3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron U3400 and N100 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support	no data	+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4	no data	4096 x 2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort	no data	4096 x 2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron U3400 and N100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	no data	12.1
OpenGL	no data	4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron U3400 and N100.

PCIe version	2.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	16	9
USB revision	no data	2.0/3.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	24 May 2010	1 January 2023
Threads	2	4
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	6 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron U3400 and N100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---