Athlon II P320 vs Celeron T3300

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron T3300
2010
35 Watt
0.40
Athlon II P320
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.44
+10%

Athlon II P320 outperforms Celeron T3300 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron T3300 and Athlon II P320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30072959
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon II
Power efficiency1.081.66
Architecture codenameno dataChamplain (2010−2011)
Release date1 January 2010 (14 years ago)12 May 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron T3300 and Athlon II P320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2.1 GHz
Bus rateno data3200 MHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache1 MBno data
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron T3300 and Athlon II P320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPGA478S1g4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron T3300 and Athlon II P320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSSE-3, SSE4A, 3DNow!, MMX, DEP, SVM
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data

Security technologies

Celeron T3300 and Athlon II P320 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron T3300 and Athlon II P320 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron T3300 0.40
Athlon II P320 0.44
+10%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron T3300 633
Athlon II P320 695
+9.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.40 0.44
Recency 1 January 2010 12 May 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

Athlon II P320 has a 10% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and 40% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron T3300 and Athlon II P320.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron T3300 and Athlon II P320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron T3300
Celeron T3300
AMD Athlon II P320
Athlon II P320

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 17 votes

Rate Celeron T3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 76 votes

Rate Athlon II P320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron T3300 or Athlon II P320, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.